The 100 attack again

There remembers Vds. of that group of called economists the 100 that they were supporting, as the CEOE, an indefinite contract with 20 days of severance pay, since now they return to the load

This group of economists tied to the Foundation Fedea, related, like not, with the Spanish Bank and the principal companies of the selective Ibex 35 comes now to exhibit his model of reform of the pensions, which they will present next Friday. How it could not be otherwise this group of economists it coincides with the proposals of the Spanish Bank, the management one and in this occasion with the Spanish socialist party. Although his proposal differs in the form, in the fund they coincide with the same: to degrade the public pensions system.

They say these illuminated that it is not a question of working any more but of achieving that it lowers the relation between the first pension and the last salary. That is to say that quoting the same has right to minor pension. Some raise to quote more to have right to the same and to quote others equally to have right at least; in the end it is the same target. And they have the audacity of making sure that with his proposal the pensions would not stand out because the economic growth will do that the people come to the retirement with higher wages and, therefore, higher pensions, even if this proportion diminishes with regard to the current situation.

Take already! They have obtained the quadrature of the circle. If it is like that of easy, since not at all that they start working, but the first skylight that they make the economy grow, second the miserable Spanish wages raise and next that convince us in his wonderful recipe. They are contradicted themselves when they say that to go out of the crisis it is necessary to lower the wages and simultaneously they predict that the economic growth will make raise the wages. In what do we stay?

To stop justifying his proposal they resort, like not, to the argument of the credibility before the financial markets, “because we need to recover the international credit that the financial markets are doubting”. Or that the politics has to subordinate itself to the plans and interests of the markets. Those who provoke the economic crises are those who, according to these illuminated, have to put the norms to go out of her. Where will so illustrious economists have studied economy? And so that the plan should come to happy term they say that the Agreement of Toledo is not the ambience adapted to decide the future of the pensions but a commission of independent experts those who should determine what the Agreement of Toledo should approve. How much will they pay big company to these 100 economists to say similar bullshit?

Health, Republic and Socialism.